Skip to content
The UK's only independent think tank devoted to higher education.

Free speech and the University of Sussex 

  • 3 April 2025
  • By Naimat Zafary
  • Naimat Zafary is a PhD researcher at the University of Sussex and a former Afghan Chevening Scholar.

There are times, as a scholar from another country, that events in your adopted home catch you off guard. The fears of those around you are so far removed from your own experience that you are baffled by them. Sometimes, this simply demands that you learn more about the society and culture around you or chalk up different perspectives to the rich experience of a global education. 

At other times, though, there is a desire to share with your colleagues your own thoughts about an issue, especially when you think others are at risk of undervaluing the freedoms and advantages they have. This week was one of those times. 

First a bit about me. I came to this country at a moment of deep crisis. An Afghan accepted for a prestigious Chevening Scholarship, I had been excited by the opportunity to study at the top university in the world for international development and to gain knowledge that I could put to use in my home country. 

But even as I packed my cases, the unimaginable happened. The US withdrew its forces and the Taliban entered Kabul. As fearful Cheveners worried whether they would or would not be granted a place on the last flights from the chaotic airport, I gathered my family. I was permitted a small rucksack as I turned my back on my family home and car, my library where local children had studied, and gathered my loved ones for the two-day journey through hell to the airport perimeter fence. When a British soldier finally recognised us and saw my name on the list, he lifted us over the wall and to safety. I kissed his shoulder and wept. 

From there, we sat on the floor of a military cargo ship and flew to an asylum hotel in London, safe at last from the Taliban, who would see us as a threat for our academic links to the UK and deep commitment to education for all, including women and girls. And so, it was I travelled by train for my first class at my academic home and inspiration, University of Sussex. 

What I found in Sussex could not have contrasted more profoundly with what I left behind. Sussex has been ranked 1st in the world for Development Studies for seven consecutive years in the QS World University Rankings. And here was a global community of men and women dedicated to the highest standards of education and using academic rigour and debate to acquire knowledge which would benefit not only the immediate community of Brighton but the wider world. 

My wife Saima and my daughters were also inspired by the women leaders who surrounded me. While former female colleagues and family members in Afghanistan were being barred from education and being driven behind burqas and closed doors, their voices silent, I was at an institution led by a courageous and principled woman committed to supporting diverse perspectives from across the world. I expressed my views in the classroom, at conferences and seminars, and in print without fear of brutal consequences. Sussex has given a platform to voiceless Afghan girls, whereas, in Afghanistan, asking a question about girls’ education is banned; Sussex made sure to value our voices and let us speak with wider audiences.

This was truly free speech. I was gifted the ability to challenge the accepted norms of government and aid agencies, and in turn, my own ideas were challenged daily by my fellow students, my supervisor, my community. I learned and grew to appreciate the diversity of thought and background which typified the world I had entered. 

So how do I respond to the idea that a place that has been to me and many hundreds of Chevening scholars from across the globe has been such a haven for free enquiry and open expression has been fined for a breach of free speech? 

I understand that the issues and debate that led to this circumstance predate the leadership of the institution I have entered. I appreciate that there are deeply held views and profound concerns at play and that the ability to speak without fear of harassment or intimidation is core to educational exchange. 

But I also know that the commonly held stereotype of my institution in some parts of the media is very wide of the mark. Those who have, like me, known the cost of true tyranny understand that places like Sussex are the very antithesis of that and an antidote to it. And so, I offer my voice and support to the university and community that not only welcomed me but encouraged me to challenge and be challenged in the pursuit of truth and global justice. It is a proud tradition and we undervalue it at our cost. 

Get our updates via email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

9 comments

  1. Paul Woodgates says:

    Thank you for this very moving and thought-provoking blog. You show how important it is to look at an issue form a range of different perspectives – your frame of reference for looking at free speech at Sussex should give us all pause for thought.

  2. Arti Kumar says:

    This touches my heart profoundly. Well done for speaking about your experiences and perspectives so eloquently, Naimat Zafary.

  3. Jeremy says:

    “The University of Sussex might have bullied and harassed a female academic out of her job for expressing a legally-protected opinion, but it’s not bad as Afghanistan.”

    I’m not sure that’s quite as compelling an argument as you seem to think.

  4. Samuel Cameron says:

    This piece contains no evidence or analysis.
    It does not engage with any of the legal or
    philosophical issues. All it does is express partisan emotion. Why is it here?
    In my opinion the response of the current vc
    to the decision lives up to the stereotype of the institution. But thats just my opinion albeit
    one many share.

  5. David Jatt says:

    The Univeristy of Sussex was literally fined over half a million pounds for failing to protect freedom of speech on its campus. It stood by while a member of staff was bullied to such an extent that she felt compelled to leave her job because of very “fear of harrassment and intimidation” that you describe in this article.

    This is thinly-disguised PR on behalf of an increasingly desparate organisation that seems incapable of any kind of reflection or apology.

  6. J Mehmet says:

    University of Sussex – just pay the fine and stop asking your people to post whataboutism articles like this.

    It makes you come off worse. Continuing to double down will not make that fine magically disappear.

  7. JK says:

    It is there because HEPI must play the woke agenda

    1. HEPI has published many pieces defending free speech, including this Policy Note and this report. We publish pieces from all perspectives and anyone is welcome to submit a piece in line with our blog guidelines.

  8. JK says:

    While I respect the horrors you have experienced, I feel you are missing the point here and make an emotional plea.

    Because there are worse things happening, it doesn’t mean we should ignore less severe incidents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *